The Maltese Association of Psychiatry has said that that “to date there is no evidence base supporting termination of pregnancy as a life-saving procedure in the context of perinatal mental illness.”
In a statement the Maltese Association of Psychiatry said that it “firmly stands with parity. Any debate on indications for termination of pregnancy as a life-saving measure in the context of mental illness must be based on evidence-based scientific facts as would happen for physical illness.”
“Consequently, we note that to date there is no evidence base supporting termination of pregnancy as a life-saving procedure in the context of perinatal mental illness,”MAP said.
It went on to say than, “as stated in our earlier statement, mental illness in this day and age is largely treatable: safe treatment is indeed available to support a mother’s recovery in the perinatal period even if in situations of imminent risk to the mother. We encourage pregnant women, mothers and their carers to seek help through the appropriate systems available.”
Previously, the Maltese Association of Psychiatry said that it had “taken note on the debate regarding termination of pregnancy, and the discussion about whether legal efforts to protect doctors seeking to save a mother’s life are over-reaching their stated goal.”
“We note with concern that there are ongoing attempts to differentiate between physical health and mental health,” the MAP said. “The MAP believes that health care needs to be holistic in its approach, and that a person cannot be truly healthy without all major systems functioning appropriately.”
“Laws and policy makers need to begin to approach the concept of health by taking all aspects into consideration when creating services, writing laws, and proposing system development,” it said.
The MAP noted that until the “Deputy Prime Minister’s encouraging words on the 28th November this approach has been largely inexistent in Malta.”
The MAP said that it is also “seriously concerned that women’s mental health and mental health assessment is being discussed or intimated in the current debates, including by the Deputy Prime Minister, but that psychiatrists, who are the experts in this field, and are also the professionals who would predictably be expected to contribute primarily to decision-making in individual cases, have not been included nor invited to discussions in which our insights can help guide the debate before irreversible decisions are made.”
“We would like to clarify that mental disorders are among the most prevalent, distressing and devastating of all illnesses, and people suffering from them should not have their experiences trivialised. However, mental illness, in this day and age is also largely treatable,” the MAP said.
The Maltese Association of Psychiatry concluded by saying that “mental illness should not be considered in isolation during such a serious debate. And mental illness should not be considered separately from other illnesses, that is to say: if the criteria for termination are to be considered the threat of loss of maternal life, then that should equally be the standard for psychiatric illness.”