AD calls for Delimara extension to be run with gasoil
Email item
| Print item
|
|
Alternattiva Demokratika . the Green Party, has this morning, appealed to government for the Delimara power station extension to be run on gasoil, rather than heavy fuel oil. AD also insisted on urgent investment in alternative and clean energy in the next budget.
Carmel Cacopardo Spokesperson on Sustainable Development and Home Affairs said, “notwithstanding the complex and complicated process the Delimara Power Extension has been through, the plant can be run on both Heavy Fuel Oil (HFO) and gasoil (diesel),”
“It is a known fact, highlighted through documentation available to the public, that gasoil has a lower environmental impact than HFO, both due to impact on the air due to emissions, as well as the by way of the fact that gasoil doesn ft produce hazardous waste.”
“The air quality in Marsaxlokk as well as the surrounding localities is already of dubious quality and MEPA has the duty to ensure that gasoil and not HFO is used while deliberating the Delimara power station environmental permit. Civil society has already expressed itself that the financial outlay to use gasoil does not exceed that cost if HFO is used. This before taking into consideration the expenses involved to dispose of the hazardous waste generated in a specialised landfill in Italy or elsewhere. The costs to be paid by society are, however, not just financial in nature. There are also social and environmental costs. The environmental costs resulting from the use of gasoil are much less than those resulting from using HFO, as the Marsa experience clearly shows. Weight has to be given to social costs as reflected primarily in respiratory ailments wherever there is a lowering of air quality. “
“If Government is willing it can still remedy the situation by considering afresh its decision and selecting gasoil as the operating fuel,” he concluded.
Michael Briguglio, AD Chairperson and Spokesperson on Economy and Finance said, “To date, Government fails to give priority to the efficient use of clean energy that can be obtained from sources such as the sun and wind. Despite the introduction of some positive measures and despite plans for capital projects in this regard, Malta keeps trailing behind other countries in the European Union. As an EU member, Malta is obliged to produce 10% of its energy from renewable sources by 2020, and it can only add CO2 emissions by 5% when compared to 2005.”
“Therefore, AD expects that the forthcoming budget will include not only sporadic initiatives and plans which remain only on paper, but a holistic policy which truly gives priority to this sector. In this way, Malta will be able to reduce its dependence on dirty energy with both economic and environmental benefits. Government should give priority to capital projects, and to fiscal measures and incentives which are holistic and not restrictive. We expect Government spending to be appropriate, and not merely ceremonial.”
Ralph Cassar, Secretary General and spokesperson on energy, industry and transport said, “It is difficult to trust the government and Enemalta with the operations of the Delimara power station extension. This is due to continuous efforts to pass false information to the public or omit certain truths. How can we trust Enemalta when it turns on and off the precipitators at Marsa power station (which collect the dust created from HFO) at will? Or after hiding behind investigations and keeping the report secret for six months, after the postponement of the consideration of the black dust problem? How can we trust the rhetoric when Enemalta and the government hid the mecaptan burnings in Imgarr? The Prime minister, despite his rhetoric on health and the environment, failed miserably in this area.”.


























