ARMS and the two tier injustice with utilities bills – Readers Letter

Email item Email item Print item Print item

ARMS and the two tier injustice with utilities bills - Readers Letter“I refer to Patricia Graham’s letter of the 13th October, 2013, which struck a chord or two with me.

It’s been simmering somewhere at the back of my mind for weeks, this thought. Ostensibly, the reason that ARMS bills are made out to the landlord is because of the fear that the tenant will leave the country without paying their bill, right? I cannot believe this rationale is legal, but that is what I have been told by various “experts.”

A spokesperson of The Malta Competition and Consumer Affairs Authority said in March, 2012: “service providers impose deposit payments on foreign residents as a safeguard in case the foreign customers leave the island without paying for any pending bills.”

But that’s like saying that everyone should be put in prison because they might commit a crime.

So let’s tar everyone with the same brush, aye, but never mind the uncollected tax revenue from the majority of landlords…….

Is there any landlord out there who actually pays tax? Does the Inland Revenue have records of revenue from rental income?

Is this a case of: Let’s penalize the non-voting, non-Maltese citizens, and the poor, disenfranchised Maltese, who, in all probability, are not even aware of this two tier tariff? Instead of alienating the criminal, tax-evading landlords by chasing them for tax on their rental income just because they DO have a vote?

If all the tax from rental income were collected, what would this amount to? How does this compare to the incorrect, over payment of tenants paying for their consumption of electricity and water at domestic rates?

For those who are unaware, there are two ARMS tariffs: domestic and residential. Residential rates are meant for anyone RESIDENT in Malta; the more expensive domestic rates are designed for owners of multiple properties.

The rationale behind the more expensive domestic rates is that it does not matter if you pay more when you are not going to spend much time in your second, third …….. property.

However, this rationale has been subverted because landlords do not want to alert the Inland Revenue to the fact that they have rent-paying tenants in their “second home”. So, the shameful result is that most tenants end up paying the more expensive domestic rate just so that the landlord can evade tax.

Personally, I think that everyone should pay the same rate. You will always find unscrupulous people making the most of any loophole they find.

Once non Maltese tenants have learnt about this scam, they then have the double whammy of trying to convince ARMS that they are resident in Malta. You see, payslips, your kids’ school correspondence, your telephony bills……. are not enough to prove your residence in Malta. For goodness sake, even your rental contract is not enough to convince ARMS that you are resident in Malta!

And this is what I find upsetting: not only do you have unscrupulous landlords taking full advantage of this loophole. You also have a Maltese company aiding and abetting this despicable practice.

So the landlords feel they can behave with impunity and, it seems, they are right to feel this way.

Because if a tenant finds out and refuses to pay for their consumption of water and electricity at the incorrectly applied domestic rate, they will find that they are out on a limb.

You see the Maltese legal system allows a landlord to issue a garnishee order against their tenant’s salary and bank account. Even though the ARMS bill is in the landlord’s name, even though ARMS has charged the RESIDENT’s consumption of water and electricity at the incorrect domestic rate, even though the landlord has not yet paid the arrears on the account, a tenant can end up in a check out at a supermarket and be told that their “payment was not authorized.” And the garnishee is in place while the small claims court deliberate on the merits or otherwise of the landlord’s claim. Which could take years. And, if the tenant wins, he /she might not get their money back immediately because the landlord might appeal the decision.

It frightens me that nothing is done about something as wrong as this.”

Johanna MacRae

Malta.

  • Permalink: ARMS and the two tier injustice with utilities bills – Readers Letter
  • You may also like...

    4 Responses

    1. joanna watson says:

      So true – one of my landlords not only overcharged me for utilities, but had the gall to charge me the full rate for the rental of a tv box at 29.99 per month when he was only being charged for it by Melita at an ‘additional room’ rate – which was CONSIDERABLY cheaper. Over the period of a year, I calculated that he had overcharged me one way or the other for nearly 1000 Euros. When I asked to see bills, I was told “We need to talk” and I never did see an official bill……..

    2. David Reiling says:

      no surprises there then.

    3. David Reiling says:

      isnt it amazing they want to talk only when the get caught out.!!!! and they will expect you to stay despite their actions

    4. Mario Ruggier says:

      This is just so wrong on ALL fronts…reeks of illegality and conspiracy, why are these issues not investigated by the proper authorities, to turf out this behaviour?

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *