Bridge to Gozo will have negative visual & environmental impact – DLH

Email item Email item Print item Print item

Bridge to Gozo will have negative visual & environmental impact - DLHDin l-Art Helwa said in a statement today that, “no matter the environmental studies now being requested, a bridge to Gozo will have such negative visual and environmental impact it should never have been proposed in the first place and should be struck off the national agenda.”

“In particular if the bridge has to touch upon Comino or even skirt it as had been suggested this would have horrendous repercussions upon this beautiful island,” DLH said.

The NGO is requesting that Government declares up front that any proposal for a permanent link will have no impact whatsoever on Comino.

Nevertheless, Din l-Art Helwa says environmental studies should have been considered from the start and not tacked on as an afterthought. Reports in the press have stated that the Chinese company carrying out a feasibility study for the bridge has now been asked ‘to broaden its study to give a greater consideration to environmental aspects’.

However, states Din l-Art Helwa, “given the massive importance of this project, it is in the national interest to ensure that all such studies are carried out by the most qualified of companies, ones which do not have any possible conflict of interest and that have been selected only after rigorous and transparent tendering processes.”

All potential impacts must be fully examined, says the NGO, emphasising that EU funds have been used in the past to cover the costs of feasibility studies.

The NGO is now requesting the government to carry out an extensive Cost Benefit Analysis in regard to permanent transport links between Gozo and Malta, which will fully compare the environmental, economic and social impacts of all available options – including a tunnel, a bridge, expanded services by sea or any other proposals.

“Broadly, the Cost Benefit Analysis should be structured in such a way as to determine if a proposed permanent link is a sound investment decision, provide a basis for comparing projects and allow the comparison of the total expected cost of each option against the total expected benefits, to see whether the benefits outweigh the costs (including any negative impact on the environment and the scenic landscape), and to what extent,” the NGO said.

Furthermore, Din l-Art Helwa said that it calls on the Minister for the Environment and Sustainable Development to “ensure that the environment is given due importance as one of the three pillars of sustainable development in all major national projects.”

Just as the initial studies that were carried out for a possible tunnel to Gozo had been published in 2012, Din l-Art Helwa requests that the feasibility study on a permanent link to Gozo that has been carried out by China Communications Construction Company on behalf of the Maltese government, should also be made available to the public without delay.

  • Permalink: Bridge to Gozo will have negative visual & environmental impact – DLH
  • You may also like...

    7 Responses

    1. Joseph Camilleri says:

      I do not agree with the bridge idea it will look ugly and ruins every thing that nature created. not even the tunnel. lets hope it stays as it is. just the ferries. no more what you call progress please.

    2. Eliza Portelli says:

      Joseph Camilleri is right!!!

    3. Sam Borg says:

      Quite right Mr Camilleri
      I guarantee you that land developers are already turning blind with glee. Comino would be the jewel on their crown.
      Fast catamaran service to St. Pauls bay, Bugibba, Sliema, Msida, Valletta, Cottonera and more, would be much helpful in reducing traffic congestions and spice up travellers daily commuting life.

      Gozoroo

    4. Sarah Springham says:

      I agree entirely with Joseph. Not only will a bridge be unsightly and environmentally damaging, it will also result in Gozo becoming a suburb of Malta rather than a separate entity, which can only be detrimental to Gozo’s future. Leave it as it is, it works perfectly well.

    5. Kerry says:

      To recall a previous article about over development in Gozo;-
      “The Island that Committed Suicide”
      Bringing work to Gozo is far more responsible and sensible than connecting the islands.

    6. Mick Cundy says:

      No decision has been made yet and it’s obvious that there will be environmental impact.

    7. A.G. says:

      Gozitans, especially those studing or working in Malta and those trvavelling overseas certainly deserve some additional means of transport, but in my opinion, a bridge will not be the right means. Gozo has already it’s own parking problems etc. What about an underground tube like the one in Victoria station, London. Gozo needs more visitors both from Malta and abroad but not more traffic congestions.The tube takes only passengers and no cars. Passengers travelling with cars can use the normal ferries.They can also leave their cars at either harbour or phone a relative to pick them at the other end, or better still use public transport. Our roads in Gozo will have less wear and tear and those living in Gozo will have less exhaust,fumes, and soot in their lungs. A.G. Gozo.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *