An appeal has been filed by the Environment and Resources Agency in order to ask the Court to revoke and cancel the decision given by the Environmental Review Tribunal and the Planning Authority on the 27th of June .

The ERA, in a statement said that by means of this decision, a restaurant in Dwejra is granted an extension.

The ERA claimed in its appeal, that the “Tribunal failed to apply or misinterpreted the Strategic Plan for the Environment and Development (SPED), which protects biodiversity, cultural heritage, geology and geomorphology, by safeguarding protected areas.”

The Authority went on to say that it believes that the Tribunal “also failed to recognise the problems arising from the intensification and expansion of development at Dwejra.”

The site is considered a Special Protection Area (SPA) and Special Area of Conservation (SAC) and is part of the Natura 2000 network because of its ecological importance, it said.

The ERA pointed out that the application intends to increase the seating capacity of the restaurant space in question. Adding that it “believes that this extension will result in more light and noise in the area that are detrimental to wildlife.”

ERA said that it also believes that in its decision, the Court focused on “limiting light intensification, the fact that the canopy is limited in size and that it can be dismantled”.

In so doing, the ERA stated, “it disregarded the fact that the development will intensify the use of the area, contrary to the spirit of the decision taken previously, whereby the Authority made it clear that it wanted to reduce the intensification of this development because of the impact on such a sensitive site.”

“The development will lead to the intensification of light pollution, especially at night, in an area that is a designated Dark Sky Heritage Area,” said the ERA.

Although the Tribunal observed that the operation of the restaurant, including the use of artificial lighting, “remains under scrutiny by the authorities concerned,” the ERA said that it believes that it is “best to avoid these circumstances in the first place.”

The ERA went on to say that the Tribunal had to consider that the proposed development is detrimental to biodiversity, especially on the population of Scopoli’s Shearwater and Yelkouan Shearwater, that are particularly sensitive to light and sound and are known to nest in the area.

The Environment and Resources Agency concluded by saying that it believes that the message communicated to Maltese society by the Tribunal “is worrying.”

“Whilst the regulator for the environment was cautious not intensify man’s influence on the site in question and to ensure the protection of the UNESCO protected site, Natura 2000 and Dark Sky Heritage Area, the message passed by the Tribunal is an opponent one.”

Last Wednesday, BirdLife Malta, on behalf of the front of 15 organisations, also filed an appeal in court to challenge the decision of the Environment and Planning Review Tribunal (EPRT) that granted a permit for further development of a restaurant in Dwejra, Gozo.

Permalink: ERA files appeal against the Dwejra restaurant extension